I wonder why people keep supporting limited features bc of the synth’s history. It’s a very different synthesizer from the original in many respects.
Well my primary wish list item, even before buying my P10, was that a voice-limiter was added so that I could play the P10 either as the P5 was originally, or with all ten voices....
... then the update came....
...with not only the ability to limit to five voices, plus 2-voice poly unison which is just next-level, plus the ability to switch between P5-style or round-robin voice allocation... And so I kind of feel like I won the synth lottery. I got everything I wanted from this synth and so much more, so asking for more at this point seems wrong somehow.
And I'm all too aware that all features come with some cost (even if the cost is support complexity), so sometimes less is more and I think the simplistic design philosophy of the Rev4 is part of what makes it what it is.
To give an example, I would love to have an option for a non-quantized (non-stepping) filter that is characteristic of Prophets. But if there were a global setting that turned that off, it would cease to sound like a Prophet for many patches -- organ tones and those relying on the lovely self-resonant filter would sound a mess as the filter wouldn't track with keyboard anymore. And many (perhaps even me) might say "I understand the consequences but would like the flexibility to opt out of filter quantization for certain scenarios". But for every scenario I could find where the synth sounded better with stepping off, there would likely be a dozen emails send to support from customers wondering why their synth was broken when they enabled it accidentally.
I'm not discouraging new features and I totally get where you're coming from re: velocity. I personally would like to see more aftertouch curves as well. But I can understand the reasons behind feature limits. Especially since once a feature is added or improved on one of Dave's products, the expectation is that feature will be added to all his products.