Has Anyone Modded The P10 So It Has Stereo Capability

[seqpro3]

I’ve always thought the P10 would benefit from stereo outputs since it has 10 voice polyphony and has the ability to do splits and layers. I saw on a forum where someone had modded their P10s headphone output and gave it stereo capability.
Wasnt sure what would be involved. Thanks  🙏

[Monzelio]

I modified mine.
I couldn't imagine split and stack mode coming out of a mono output, so I searched online and found a kit to separate the outputs, using the headphone output.
It's not easy; you need to have a professional engineer do it.
In stereo stack mode, it sounds huge; I use it a lot, even with the same sound slightly modified.
In split mode, you have the two voices separate; in normal, the sound changes depending on how many polyphonic voices you play simultaneously.
For purists, even the original Prophet 10 had two outputs.
The consequence of this choice is that modifying it voids the warranty.

[nunucello]

Would be cool if Sequential offered a stereo upgrade kit....  It would definitely sell. 

Sequential - everyone would probably buy one.

[seqpro3]

Would be cool if Sequential offered a stereo upgrade kit....  It would definitely sell. 

Sequential - everyone would probably buy one.

It would be great if a stereo upgrade kit was offered. The P10Rev4 would greatly benefit with
stereo capability. It would rival the OBX8. I have a OBX8 and the reason I chose it over the P10Rev4
was because it was in stereo.

[Circuitry85]

I modified mine.
I couldn't imagine split and stack mode coming out of a mono output, so I searched online and found a kit to separate the outputs, using the headphone output.
It's not easy; you need to have a professional engineer do it.
In stereo stack mode, it sounds huge; I use it a lot, even with the same sound slightly modified.
In split mode, you have the two voices separate; in normal, the sound changes depending on how many polyphonic voices you play simultaneously.
For purists, even the original Prophet 10 had two outputs.
The consequence of this choice is that modifying it voids the warranty.

Did a search. Couldn't find anything. Do you think you can share the link to the stereo output kit? I wanted to give my business to sequential. But I do not think they are going to offer this upgrade. Really appreciate if you'd share the link to this mod. I'm going to buy the additional 5 voice board; and as you. I couldn't imagine using the split and stack modes in a mono output.  Thank you in advance.

[Quatschmacher]

I modified mine.
I couldn't imagine split and stack mode coming out of a mono output, so I searched online and found a kit to separate the outputs, using the headphone output.
It's not easy; you need to have a professional engineer do it.
In stereo stack mode, it sounds huge; I use it a lot, even with the same sound slightly modified.
In split mode, you have the two voices separate; in normal, the sound changes depending on how many polyphonic voices you play simultaneously.
For purists, even the original Prophet 10 had two outputs.
The consequence of this choice is that modifying it voids the warranty.

Did a search. Couldn't find anything. Do you think you can share the link to the stereo output kit? I wanted to give my business to sequential. But I do not think they are going to offer this upgrade. Really appreciate if you'd share the link to this mod. I'm going to buy the additional 5 voice board; and as you. I couldn't imagine using the split and stack modes in a mono output.  Thank you in advance.

http://technologyroom.net/

Manual here:
http://technologyroom.net/docs/Prophet-R4-Stereo-Panning-Upgrade.pdf

[558]

Would be cool if Sequential offered a stereo upgrade kit....  It would definitely sell. 

Sequential - everyone would probably buy one.

It would be great if a stereo upgrade kit was offered. The P10Rev4 would greatly benefit with
stereo capability. It would rival the OBX8. I have a OBX8 and the reason I chose it over the P10Rev4
was because it was in stereo.

What you want to do is get a Stereo synth.  There is a possibility I don't know what you think, to use the DAW and just use its sends to channel your synth here and there throughout the L-R field.  I do that in my base template so it always comes through.  Here I have a video I made about 2 3 weeks ago and posted on Rumble.  This is about 10 minutes I think it's a good bit of Prophet that's why I uploaded it.  You should notice it's really a stereo sound.  This is all done with those 10 sends in my DAW each having a different EQ focusing on a different frequency.  It's a lot different than a basic Mono would be. 
https://rumble.com/v74u8aw-sequential-circuits-prophet-10-rev-4-synthesizer-asmr.html

[558]

Changed DAW settings and ran that Prophet out from the 'stereo-ized' prophet into a pair of outs I rout to one of 10 oscilloscopes I run that I have set up to stereo to usually show one of 2 VSTs.  So you can see the difference between the L & R channels is pretty significant even if it doesn't sound that much different.

For using the oscilloscope I run the L & R out of the daw, out a patch cable and back in to another interface or pair of ins and it is seen here the two tone blue active oscilloscope for most of the video  https://rumble.com/v75elyc-a-little-heavy-music-feb-6-2026.html

I usually run about 11 oscilloscopes (each set accordingly via from the ins that bring the audio for every different instrument or VST) but in this video because I am not playing live but mixing and watching the daw I only use the prophet 10 stereo oscilloscope for the video.  I'll probably keep it this way.  I may switch up the replaced VST onto that Drum track oscilloscope (who needs an oscilloscope to a drum track).

[Analog Prophet]

A very simple and effective way to achive a stero P5/10 is to record same thing twice and hard pan left and right. The sound moves enough to get a stereo field.

[LPF83]

A very simple and effective way to achive a stero P5/10 is to record same thing twice and hard pan left and right. The sound moves enough to get a stereo field.

Especially if it's literally 2 different takes of the same... old school multi tracking like that actually ends up sounding better most of the time due to small variations in playing on each side and is why a lot of older tracks sound so good.

[Analog Prophet]

A very simple and effective way to achive a stero P5/10 is to record same thing twice and hard pan left and right. The sound moves enough to get a stereo field.

Especially if it's literally 2 different takes of the same... old school multi tracking like that actually ends up sounding better most of the time due to small variations in playing on each side and is why a lot of older tracks sound so good.

The benefit of this approach, compared to other stereo-spreading techniques (except voice stereo spreading), is that the phase remains intact, ensuring it sounds good on any sound system.

[TWEBB]

A very simple and effective way to achive a stero P5/10 is to record same thing twice and hard pan left and right. The sound moves enough to get a stereo field.

Hello. I wanted to ask a question about this technique. I mainly use my Prophet 10 sequenced by MIDI, rather than playing it by hand. I have found that when I use MIDI to play the same exact take twice (so there are no variations in timing or velocity), the two takes STILL sound different enough to give a nice stereo image, or "double tracking." I'm amazed that two of the same exact takes sound different enough to achieve this, despite being synced by MIDI. I really enjoy it. What accounts for the variations being so audible when the tracks are played by side? What causes the inconsistencies, if not the player's natural error?

[Analog Prophet]

It’s analog.

[558]

A very simple and effective way to achive a stero P5/10 is to record same thing twice and hard pan left and right. The sound moves enough to get a stereo field.

Hello. I wanted to ask a question about this technique. I mainly use my Prophet 10 sequenced by MIDI, rather than playing it by hand. I have found that when I use MIDI to play the same exact take twice (so there are no variations in timing or velocity), the two takes STILL sound different enough to give a nice stereo image, or "double tracking." I'm amazed that two of the same exact takes sound different enough to achieve this, despite being synced by MIDI. I really enjoy it. What accounts for the variations being so audible when the tracks are played by side? What causes the inconsistencies, if not the player's natural error?

Well the oscillators aren't synced to your midi start or stop or anything either.  I figure they're going round and round or whatever and they don't stack up the same at all.  There is one sync button but it has nothing to do with the MIDI.  Plus all the other things.  It's got the best oscilloscope monitored waveforms of any of my synths.  Though the JP08 sometimes gets pretty gnarly and the System 1m.  The Prophet is the one that dances the best and has the best rhythmic offsets.  I watch the stuff everytime I play it.  It's really true the Prophet just has the electric waveforms.