Thanks very much, Hoodoo_ray. Whatever we disagreed about is irrelevant now. All has been forgotten.
I would obviously agree with you about the early DSI days. There truly was something new and exciting that was happening then. DSI was out in the front of the industry and a leading force in the analog and knob-per-function revival. In first discovering Dave's work in the significant year of 2007, I felt as if I had found a pearl unlike any other pearl (not that I'm into pearls!). And personally, it opened up great musical possibilities, such as I had not previously recognized in synthesis.
The synthesizer world is now flooded with so many instruments that the announcement of yet another brilliant, fabulous, spectacular, nothing-else-like-it synthesizer is...redundant. Wonderful - a thousand-and-one features at our fingertips. Yet the forums will still murmur with threads pleading for new features, since the latest instrument has already been recognized as inadequate. How could the company possibly have overlooked such-and-such a feature?
Enough of this tread mill; I'm jumping off now. I've wanted to for years. I'm content with synthesis just as it is and feel no need for some missing feature.
Pardon me, but the organist within just isn't impressed by such magnitude, by technological more, more, more. It makes the rei-issues of vintage instruments seem interesting by comparison. Meanwhile, I haven't lost one iota of fascination with the Poly Evolver and Prophet '08. After all these years, still, nothing strikes my ear like an Evolver. What I have, in other words, is more than enough. I'm slaying the gear dragon once and for all.
Anyway, thanks for the kind sentiments. Leaving this forum gives me a lump in the throat. It's often been a happy escape when other parts of life were not so bright.