Just my 2 cents
Some of the comments in here are expected... some of them not so. People in the thread shout “no more recreations” probably are first in line for a p5? Regardless it is not at all a recreation of the sp1200. It pays homage for sure. It takes some of the best parts of a 1200 (the fader workflow, the crunchy sound, the ability to use analog filters to round out a sound). But that’s kinda where that stuff ends. From live looping to long sample times to external midi sequencing etc s2400 is NOT a clone or remake.
It’s also NOT a DAW in a box like the force/MPC line. It’s back to feeling like a dedicated device.
There is a lot to love about that workflow but it’s not for everyone. Just like tempest is not for everyone.
I very much have a love hate relationship with my tempest. On the one hand I much prefer it’s workflow over my rytm mk2 , though I prefer the sound of the rytm... I’m irked by the underspec’d processor and memory and the glitched internal sample bank. But I love the UI and open ended voices.
Never once did I think “man the tempest needs an fx processor built in.” That’s not what the tempest is. I feel the same about the s2400 but with the daughter card slot ... I can very much see fx and more being a possibility .... but I’d still probably use external dedicated FX. Because , well that’s their job.
I have and use my akai force a ton with my synths. I don’t look at the s2400 as occupying the same space in my studio.