As I'm considering a possible upgrade of the REV2 to 16 voices I just bumped into the KingKorg which I had never heard of before. It is cheaper (second hand though) than a REV2 upgrade and seems to offer a pretty amazing spectrum of sounds and effects. I did a quick search on this forum and found that many people found the KK mundane but I found its sound interesting.
Having read documentation I found:
+KK: huge polyphony, effects, and a variety of sound generators and filters. I also find the panel simple and easy.
+REV2: true analog, one LFO per voice (which BTW is not always desirable), gated sequencer, 2 more LFOs and 1 more ADSR
I never played with a KK so I basically don't really know more than what's on youtube.
Hence my question is: is that a ridiculous comparison or the KK is a true underdog?