...
Understandable, but is the implication that I shouldn't expect my old files created in earlier Betas to work after an update?
This is my interpretation. It may have even been communicated to me.
I see it as the "small, fine print."
It makes total sense to me, for methodological motivations. I see it as the responsibility that comes with the privilege to Beta test an instrument I care about.
But, for those that this is a problem, they can find ways around it. (And I can appreciate why.) My suggestions are:
1. Don't get involved in Beta assessing.*
2. Change workflow/mindset that can accommodate this potential file incompatibility scenario with the last official OS.
3. Stay in whatever OS you feel may have greatest chance of being compatible with last OS. And, if you have a free session or four, test your most vital functions in current OS, and then go back to your "file compatibility" OS.
*Not assessing this current Beta OS is a little like voting for a bill without reading it. I.e., if you can find time to assess it, or accommodate the temporary state of potential future file incompatibility that seems to accompany assessing Betas, do it.
If that's the case I might just hold off on saving new files on the Tempest until a final OS is actually released, as it's a bit of a pain to recreate them every time a new Beta comes out.
Sounds reasonable.
When I get the time I'll test things using the Factory content only, thanks.
!!!!
I think all Beta folk should adopt this, if and when they encounter an issue. (I believe it will reduce frustration on forum.)