DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation

Sacred Synthesis

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #260 on: January 21, 2016, 10:47:36 AM »
And maybe you, too, Paul?  :o

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #261 on: January 21, 2016, 10:49:56 AM »

Sacred Synthesis

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #262 on: January 21, 2016, 10:52:57 AM »
Sorry!  I knew that comment was going to hurt.  Ah well, it's only another $200.

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #263 on: January 21, 2016, 10:53:45 AM »
Sorry!  I knew that comment was going to hurt.

I need some livers and mothers to sell.

dslsynth

  • ***
  • 1040
Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #264 on: January 21, 2016, 10:57:42 AM »
Sigh…

So you bought a Prophet-6 right before gearmas and now want the OB-6 instead?
« Last Edit: January 21, 2016, 10:59:14 AM by dslsynth »
#!/bin/sh
cp -f $0 $HOME/.signature

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #265 on: January 21, 2016, 10:58:04 AM »
Correct me somebody: Basically, the OB6 is a P6 with a state variable filter instead of a lowpass and a highpass, right? Other differences include separate PWM and square wave subs. Anything else I overlooked?

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #266 on: January 21, 2016, 10:59:29 AM »
Sigh…

So you bought a Prophet-6 right before gearmas and now want to the OB-6 instead?

I didn't buy anything yet. I think I'll stick to the P6. I like what I've heard so far though. Very delicious. I guess the true answer is both, haha.

dslsynth

  • ***
  • 1040
Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #267 on: January 21, 2016, 10:59:59 AM »
Looks so!
#!/bin/sh
cp -f $0 $HOME/.signature

eXode

  • ***
  • 251
Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #268 on: January 21, 2016, 11:06:02 AM »
I hope that there will be a OB-6 Module available sooner rather than later (like with the Prophet-6).

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #269 on: January 21, 2016, 11:07:35 AM »
I hope that there will be a OB-6 Module available sooner rather than later (like with the Prophet-6).

Probably at the end of the year if the keyboard sells well.

dslsynth

  • ***
  • 1040
Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #270 on: January 21, 2016, 11:08:32 AM »
I like what I've heard so far though. Very delicious. I guess the true answer is both, haha.

Hehe! You are not the only one complaining about that problem of wanting both of them now. Very expectable reaction. Saw something similar in the INHALT demo comments as well.

However there is a cure for that! Imagine a four pole state-variable multi-mode filter with a resonance color parameter. That would cover both types of sounds and actually sweep between them in case of a complex modulation voice architecture. Have to happen one day!
#!/bin/sh
cp -f $0 $HOME/.signature

Sacred Synthesis

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #271 on: January 21, 2016, 11:10:57 AM »
Oh, I have the solution: MIDI together the OB-6 Keyboard and the Prophet-6 Module.  See, wasn't that simple?

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #272 on: January 21, 2016, 11:12:06 AM »
Oh, I have the solution: MIDI together the OB-6 Keyboard and the Prophet-6 Module.  See, wasn't that simple?

That's cheating!

Sacred Synthesis

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #273 on: January 21, 2016, 12:11:50 PM »
We might as well move our discussion over to the new OB-6 sub forum.

dslsynth

  • ***
  • 1040
Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #274 on: January 21, 2016, 12:12:46 PM »
First Dave interview from this years NAMM show (via matrixsynth):
https://youtu.be/rF6AE2upf9w
#!/bin/sh
cp -f $0 $HOME/.signature

Sacred Synthesis

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #275 on: January 21, 2016, 12:46:02 PM »
Has anybody heard news about Korg?  Is the ARP 2600 rumor dead?

Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #276 on: January 21, 2016, 12:56:05 PM »
Looks like it :(

Razmo

  • ***
  • 2168
  • I am shadow...
    • Kaleidoscopic Artworks
Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #277 on: January 21, 2016, 01:00:11 PM »
Correct me somebody: Basically, the OB6 is a P6 with a state variable filter instead of a lowpass and a highpass, right? Other differences include separate PWM and square wave subs. Anything else I overlooked?

Yeah... some digital Oberheim emulated FX like a phaser and also something about a ringmodulation something...
If you need me, follow the shadows...

chysn

  • *****
  • 1812
Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #278 on: January 21, 2016, 01:52:03 PM »
Well, so no Sequential monosynth this time. Damn, I thought that was practically a lock.

My next move, I think, will be to start seriously looking at the Pro-2.
Prophet 5 Rev 4 #2711

MPC One+ ∙ MuseScore 4

www.wav2pro3.comwww.soundcloud.com/beige-mazewww.github.com/chysnwww.beigemaze.com

he/him/his

dslsynth

  • ***
  • 1040
Re: DSI at NAMM 2016 Speculation
« Reply #279 on: January 21, 2016, 02:10:03 PM »
Well, so no Sequential monosynth this time. Damn, I thought that was practically a lock.

Well same kind of experience as I have at most NAMM shows: Darn, not the kind of machine I was hoping for! Basically that is how DSI operates most of the time. Still they keep turning out new machines with interesting voice architecture as well as sound ingredients. Now its about time for them to wise up and make something for the rest of us! Probably not that its going to happen but who knows? ;)
#!/bin/sh
cp -f $0 $HOME/.signature