The Official Sequential/Oberheim Forum

OTHER DISCUSSIONS => General Synthesis => Off Topic => Topic started by: Paul Dither on September 16, 2016, 03:36:03 PM

Title: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 16, 2016, 03:36:03 PM
RIP, Mr. West Coast.

http://www.factmag.com/2016/09/16/don-buchla-dies-synthesizer/ (http://www.factmag.com/2016/09/16/don-buchla-dies-synthesizer/)
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Sacred Synthesis on September 16, 2016, 05:10:42 PM
A giant has fallen.
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: chysn on September 16, 2016, 05:11:40 PM
Yeah, just about to post this, so thank you. This summer's Subotnick obsession necessarily extended to a Buchla obsession, and I was saddened by this news.
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 17, 2016, 07:09:10 AM
Here's a nice piece by Suzanne Ciani and Kaitlyn Aurelia Smith featuring the Music Easel and the 200e.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5Xaw5r43n0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5Xaw5r43n0)
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: dslsynth on September 17, 2016, 12:57:18 PM
Very sad news indeed! My first source was this tweet:
https://twitter.com/kaitlynaurelia/status/776897971078045697
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: chysn on September 17, 2016, 03:03:01 PM
I spent some time a couple weeks ago geeking out on the Buchla website, looking at the modules that make up the 200e and other systems. It was fun to do because the components are both familiar and foreign. The influence of Buchla is obvious in eurorack modules by Make Noise and Pittsburgh Modular and others, specifically things like function generators, complex waveform oscillators, and low pass gates.

As I've learned about these modules, I've wondered why some of these ideas never broke through into mainstream commercial keyboard synthesizers. The low pass gate is particularly distinctive and would be interesting in a Prophet-like analog synth. Function generators are flexible replacements for envelope generators and LFOs, and could certainly find a place.

It's like some big marketing machine decided that the Moog-style substractive synthesis model was the only thing worth doing, in endless variations, but it's not like that at all.
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 17, 2016, 04:29:34 PM
I spent some time a couple weeks ago geeking out on the Buchla website, looking at the modules that make up the 200e and other systems. It was fun to do because the components are both familiar and foreign. The influence of Buchla is obvious in eurorack modules by Make Noise and Pittsburgh Modular and others, specifically things like function generators, complex waveform oscillators, and low pass gates.

As I've learned about these modules, I've wondered why some of these ideas never broke through into mainstream commercial keyboard synthesizers. The low pass gate is particularly distinctive and would be interesting in a Prophet-like analog synth. Function generators are flexible replacements for envelope generators and LFOs, and could certainly find a place.

It's like some big marketing machine decided that the Moog-style substractive synthesis model was the only thing worth doing, in endless variations, but it's not like that at all.

All true. First things first, though: As for reasons of the more recent past, I feel rather glad not to have been be able to afford a Buchla system of any kind (of course that's only half true). I'm talking about the ugly relationship between Buchla and the company of the same name:
http://www.factmag.com/2015/03/25/don-buchla-audio-supermarket-buchla-electronic-musical-instruments-lawsuit/ (http://www.factmag.com/2015/03/25/don-buchla-audio-supermarket-buchla-electronic-musical-instruments-lawsuit/)
http://cdm.link/2015/03/synth-pioneer-don-buchla-takes-owners-former-company-court/ (http://cdm.link/2015/03/synth-pioneer-don-buchla-takes-owners-former-company-court/)

As for the type of synthesis: I completely agree, although this time around - by which I mean the time of the resurgence of modular systems - more and more of Buchla's ideas and concepts reach a wider audience thanks to manufacturers like Makenoise, Verbos, and basically anyone, who's following through with a less mainstream product. And with the rise of new controllers and keyboards becoming just one input device amongst many others, lots of opportunities are being created for synths to come to their own right without being tied to the (same) past too much, which was one of Buchla's aims.

Whether there are any chances for some of Buchla's ideas to be implemented in instruments beyond the Eurorack world, I don't know. It would be incredibly cool and to some degree that's almost overdue. I would have hoped for Dave and Don to join forces at some point, but that opportunity is sadly lost now.
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 17, 2016, 05:00:36 PM
(https://scontent-frt.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14358895_1312633798761481_8390434542908420634_n.jpg?oh=126356df02d78ab6c98fbdebc22d149b&oe=58778401)
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: chysn on September 17, 2016, 05:07:18 PM
Great pic.

Didn't know that about the Buchla company. Last week, Music Easels were in stock, but now they're sold out and back-ordered, so apparently the relationship between the man and the company is not common knowledge.
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: DavidDever on September 17, 2016, 05:32:02 PM
It's a safe assumption, if not an unfortunate one, that most creative types are not necessarily the most legal- or business-savvy when it comes to mergers / acquisitions / licensing deals.

It's always advisable not to use your last name as part of your company or LLC name, unless you're a sole proprietor and have no plans on converting your company to a corporation with / without additional partners / investors, or you plan on winding down the structure at the time of (or before) your death. Otherwise, you have a whole series of additional hoops to jump through with respect to licensing the use of your (last) name by someone else, which (in this case) would have saved a lot of hassle.

Setting that aside: there were two factors that affected the uptake of Don Buchla's synthesis ideas:

Let's hope Don's ideas carry on into a new generation of modular users that understand what products such as the Music Easel were all about, rather than having to hear the same filter sweeps over-and-over for the next thirty years....
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: BobTheDog on September 18, 2016, 12:18:33 AM
I spent some time a couple weeks ago geeking out on the Buchla website, looking at the modules that make up the 200e and other systems. It was fun to do because the components are both familiar and foreign. The influence of Buchla is obvious in eurorack modules by Make Noise and Pittsburgh Modular and others, specifically things like function generators, complex waveform oscillators, and low pass gates.

As I've learned about these modules, I've wondered why some of these ideas never broke through into mainstream commercial keyboard synthesizers. The low pass gate is particularly distinctive and would be interesting in a Prophet-like analog synth. Function generators are flexible replacements for envelope generators and LFOs, and could certainly find a place.

It's like some big marketing machine decided that the Moog-style substractive synthesis model was the only thing worth doing, in endless variations, but it's not like that at all.

Have you looked at Aalto: http://madronalabs.com/products/aalto

Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: chysn on September 18, 2016, 07:02:09 AM
Quote
Have you looked at Aalto: http://madronalabs.com/products/aalto

No. I'm vaguely aware that PC-based synths exist.
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: dslsynth on September 18, 2016, 03:36:47 PM
As I've learned about these modules, I've wondered why some of these ideas never broke through into mainstream commercial keyboard synthesizers. The low pass gate is particularly distinctive and would be interesting in a Prophet-like analog synth. Function generators are flexible replacements for envelope generators and LFOs, and could certainly find a place.

Its a very good indication of there being plenty of space for more innovation in the field of MIDI controlled hybrid analog/digital synthesizers!
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: dslsynth on September 18, 2016, 03:38:51 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/18/arts/music/don-buchla-dead.html

His composition “Cicada Music” (1963) calls for “approximately 2,500 six-legged performers.”

I like his style!
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 18, 2016, 03:59:38 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/18/arts/music/don-buchla-dead.html

His composition “Cicada Music” (1963) calls for “approximately 2,500 six-legged performers.”

I like his style!

Haha! I experienced some serious cicada music in Nashville in 2011.

Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJcFiCaEBnI (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJcFiCaEBnI)
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 18, 2016, 04:08:56 PM
Looking forward to this documentary: https://vimeo.com/161837305/4e25635b24 (https://vimeo.com/161837305/4e25635b24)
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 18, 2016, 04:12:12 PM
And a lecture for those of you who can spend 2 hours: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPO3YSJQtM4 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPO3YSJQtM4)
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: dslsynth on September 18, 2016, 04:14:15 PM
Haha! I experienced some serious cicada music in Nashville in 2011.

Sometimes nature exceeds even artistic imaginations!

. o O ( denashing bugville )

Looking forward to this documentary: https://vimeo.com/161837305/4e25635b24 (https://vimeo.com/161837305/4e25635b24)

I remember seeing the kickstarter page for this documentary when it was started. Was very close to back it.
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: dslsynth on September 18, 2016, 04:20:48 PM
If one and a half hour is enough: How Complicated Could a Metronome Be?
https://youtu.be/3OE8qHrRx-g

Or if two and a half hour would be better: RBMA Toronto 2007 Lecture
https://youtu.be/yfOyAUv-NwA

Or if you like it as multiple slices: Don Buchla Interview
https://youtu.be/EOiGXI2H-zY
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 18, 2016, 04:28:16 PM
Thanks for sharing those!

Or if two and a half hour would be better: RBMA Toronto 2007 Lecture
https://youtu.be/yfOyAUv-NwA

Argh, if only this interview wasn't done by this incompetent RBMA guy. He also did a very uninspired interview with Dave if I remember correctly.
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: dslsynth on September 18, 2016, 04:37:38 PM
Have to agree on the interviewer evaluation, Paul Dither!

Here is a classic background video of the Dead Presidents Society (http://www.rogerlinndesign.com/dead-presidents-society.html) via KMI:
https://youtu.be/AMOV-YQLDAE
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 18, 2016, 05:19:38 PM
I like this one in particular, as I'm becoming more and more interested in alternative rhythm generators:

If one and a half hour is enough: How Complicated Could a Metronome Be?
https://youtu.be/3OE8qHrRx-g

And I also know why you picked it: Euclidean rhythms.  ;)
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: Paul Dither on September 20, 2016, 01:09:59 AM
Here's another great and dense interview from the December 1982 issue of the Keyboard magazine: http://www.keyboardmag.com/artists/1236/the-horizons-of-instrument-design-a-conversation-with-don-buchla/59510 (http://www.keyboardmag.com/artists/1236/the-horizons-of-instrument-design-a-conversation-with-don-buchla/59510)

I've rarely read such a thorough interview and learned quit a bit about Buchla's design choices (especially with regard to exponential and linear characteristics, sound and structure).

Don Buchla also addresses the discussion about input devices, which might be a great read for chysn and Sacred Synthesis.
Title: Re: Don Buchla
Post by: chysn on September 20, 2016, 05:54:11 AM
Wow, that's some good stuff there. I learned things I can use in my modular system. For example, I use a linear VCA and set the EG (usually a Make Noise Function) up for exponential response. So, I do it backwards.